Repositório Digital do Transporte

  1. Repositório Digital do Transporte
  2. Projetos Aplicativos
  3. Gestão de Sistemas Ferroviários e Metroferroviários (FM)
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.itl.org.br/jspui/handle/123456789/780
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.advisorBarreto, Davi-
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Heider Augusto da Silva-
dc.contributor.authorManrique, Humberto Claudio-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Rodrigo Pacheco de-
dc.contributor.authorBragatto, Ticiano Augusto Callai-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-04T20:49:04Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-04T20:49:04Z-
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationGOMES, Heider Augusto da Silva et al. A case study on Brazilian regulation of railroad accidents and incidents: focus on different regulations around the world, the evolution and impacts of Brazilian regulation. 2024. 27 f. Final Project (International Certification in Management of Rail and Metro Rail Systems) - Deutsche Bahn; Instituto de Transporte e Logística, Brasília, 2024.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.itl.org.br/jspui/handle/123456789/780-
dc.descriptionFinal Project (International Certification in Management of Rail and Metro Rail Systems) - Deutsche Bahn; Instituto de Transporte e Logística, Brasília, 2024.en_US
dc.subjectRegulationen_US
dc.subjectFreight railroadsen_US
dc.subjectInvestigationen_US
dc.subjectCommunicationen_US
dc.subjectAccidentsen_US
dc.titleA case study on Brazilian regulation of railroad accidents and incidents: focus on different regulations around the world, the evolution and impacts of Brazilian regulationen_US
dc.contributor.emailheideraugusto.gomes@gmail.comen_US
dc.contributor.emailhumbertocmanrique@gmail.comen_US
dc.contributor.emailpachecodeoliveira@gmail.comen_US
dc.contributor.emailtbragatto@gmail.comen_US
dc.publisher.cityBrasíliaen_US
dc.description.resumoThe regulation of Brazilian railroads began in the 1990s, during the privatization process of the main public freight railroads. These concessions had only two KPIs to ensure the execution of the contracts for what is still considered a public service (traffic movement and railway safety). In the following decades, the regulation revised the process of investigation and communication of accidents with the need for more and more information to be sent to the Regulatory Agency, creating a more complex regulatory process for both parties. Different economic regions around the world report and control rail safety in different ways. The FRA, the U.S. Railroad Administration, for example, classifies an accident according to its monetary impact. The ERA – European Union Agency for Railways – through several National Investigation Bodies (NIB) investigates only serious accidents that reach a certain level of social and financial impact (fatalities, serious injuries or damage above a certain monetary value) and/or those that, depending on circumstances, would become serious. The objective of this work is to investigate the different parameters of the regulation of these three economic blocks (Brazil, USA and EU), evaluating their regulatory burden, as well as to analyze the new Brazilian railway legal framework (Law nº. 14,273/2021), in which accidents that are not directly caused by a train operation should not be accounted for in the KPIs of its regulator.en_US
dc.description.classFM - T03en_US
Aparece nas coleções:Gestão de Sistemas Ferroviários e Metroferroviários (FM)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
A case study on Brazilian regulation of railroad accidents and incidents.pdf1.4 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Recomendar este item Visualizar estatísticas


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.